cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Daniel Fagerstrom <dani...@nada.kth.se>
Subject Re: [Design] JXTG 2.0 (Just say yes!)
Date Mon, 06 Dec 2004 14:57:32 GMT
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:

> Le 6 déc. 04, à 15:41, Glen Ezkovich a écrit :
>
>> On Dec 6, 2004, at 8:14 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
>>
>>> Le 6 déc. 04, à 15:07, Vadim Gritsenko a écrit :
>>>
>>>> Reinhard Poetz wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> IIRC we aggreed that we like the current syntax of JXTemplate. 
>>>>> Exception: We deprecate the #{} notation in favour of ${xpath:....}.
>>>>
>>>> If nobody said this already (I have 150 or so mails to go ...), 
>>>> more than one EL per template is clear FS to me. I'd be in favor of 
>>>> specifying EL at the TemplateGenerator declaration time, and would 
>>>> not go more granular than this...
>>>
>>> +1, it might be good to have pluggable languages but run-time 
>>> switching is definitely FS - and confusing as well.
>>
>> Thank you. Think this approach is applicable to the tag vs. attribute 
>> debate?
>
> Sure. Having mixed languages or mixed tag/attributes templating 
> mechanisms in the same template sounds equally confusing.

What about being able to mix Groovy's XML sytax with the the ordinary 
one, wouldn't that be nice ;)

/Daniel


Mime
View raw message