Reinhard Poetz wrote:
> Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
>
>> One concern is to come up with a unified template language. This implies:
>>
>> 1) understanding the features we want (and we don't want!) from a
>> template language
>> 2) come up with a syntax
>> 3) implement it
>>
>> Another and completely separate concern is how to factor out existing
>> bits so that #3 is easier.
>>
>> You are attacking #3 before attacking #1 and #2 and that's why
>> everybody here is feeling frustration: there is no consensus on #1
>
> I don't think so. There were tons of mails and IMHO we agreed on a list
> of features (maybe a final summary is missing)
I would be very helpful if we could agree on the above two points with a
vote (and a summary, of course) before moving on.
--
Stefano.
|