cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Daniel Fagerstrom <dani...@nada.kth.se>
Subject Re: svn commit: r109328 - in cocoon/branches/BRANCH_2_1_X: . src/blocks/template src/blocks/template/conf src/blocks/template/java src/blocks/template/java/org src/blocks/template/java/org/apache src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/el src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/el/jexl src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/el/util src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/template src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/template/generation src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/template/script src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/template/tag src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/template/tag/samples src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/util src/blocks/template/samples src/blocks/template/test src/blocks/template/test/org src/blocks/template/test/org/apache src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/el src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/el/je! xl src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/el/util src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/template src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/template/generation src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/template/script src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/util
Date Wed, 01 Dec 2004 15:52:19 GMT
Leszek Gawron wrote:

> Upayavira wrote:
>
>> Leszek Gawron wrote:
>>
>>> Upayavira wrote:
>>>
>>>> Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Leszek Gawron wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> <snip/>
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks for commiting the template stuff !
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But do you really think that it is worth the effort to keep 
>>>>>>> 2.1.x syncronized with trunk wrt template at this early stage
of 
>>>>>>> development? I'd prefer to sync it when we are a little bit more

>>>>>>> shure about what interfaces we should have and so on.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Fine by me. Still we can sync once a few revisions.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> We can do that, but then we have to change the code so that it is 
>>>>> Java 1.3 compatible (or just turn of compilation of the block in 
>>>>> 2.1.x by default). The code contains some java.nio stuff which 
>>>>> IIRC not is contained in 1.3.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Really, this should be developed in trunk, and then back-ported 
>>>> when it reaches a level of stability (unless we get 2.2 out quick 
>>>> enough :-) )
>>>>
>>>> Trunk is where new stuff goes, IMO.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I see, sorry for the mess. 
>>
>>
>>
>> No probs. That's what the rest of us are here for!
>>
>>> Should I disable the block build by default ?
>>
>>
>>
>> Erm. In trunk, I would leave it enabled. After all, it is just 
>> another unstable block.
>
> I mean 2.1.x
>
Disable it in 2.1.x.

/Daniel


Mime
View raw message