cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Leszek Gawron <lgaw...@mobilebox.pl>
Subject Re: svn commit: r109328 - in cocoon/branches/BRANCH_2_1_X: . src/blocks/template src/blocks/template/conf src/blocks/template/java src/blocks/template/java/org src/blocks/template/java/org/apache src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/el src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/el/jexl src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/el/util src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/template src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/template/generation src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/template/script src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/template/tag src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/template/tag/samples src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/util src/blocks/template/samples src/blocks/template/test src/blocks/template/test/org src/blocks/template/test/org/apache src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/el src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/el/je! xl src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/el/util src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/template src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/template/generation src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/template/script src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/util
Date Wed, 01 Dec 2004 15:09:28 GMT
Upayavira wrote:
> Leszek Gawron wrote:
> 
>> Upayavira wrote:
>>
>>> Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
>>>
>>>> Leszek Gawron wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> <snip/>
>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks for commiting the template stuff !
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But do you really think that it is worth the effort to keep 2.1.x

>>>>>> syncronized with trunk wrt template at this early stage of 
>>>>>> development? I'd prefer to sync it when we are a little bit more

>>>>>> shure about what interfaces we should have and so on.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Fine by me. Still we can sync once a few revisions.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> We can do that, but then we have to change the code so that it is 
>>>> Java 1.3 compatible (or just turn of compilation of the block in 
>>>> 2.1.x by default). The code contains some java.nio stuff which IIRC 
>>>> not is contained in 1.3.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Really, this should be developed in trunk, and then back-ported when 
>>> it reaches a level of stability (unless we get 2.2 out quick enough 
>>> :-) )
>>>
>>> Trunk is where new stuff goes, IMO.
>>
>>
>> I see, sorry for the mess. 
> 
> 
> No probs. That's what the rest of us are here for!
> 
>> Should I disable the block build by default ?
> 
> 
> Erm. In trunk, I would leave it enabled. After all, it is just another 
> unstable block.
I mean 2.1.x

-- 
Leszek Gawron                                      lgawron@mobilebox.pl
Project Manager                                    MobileBox sp. z o.o.
+48 (61) 855 06 67                              http://www.mobilebox.pl
mobile: +48 (501) 720 812                       fax: +48 (61) 853 29 65

Mime
View raw message