cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Upayavira ...@upaya.co.uk>
Subject Re: svn commit: r109328 - in cocoon/branches/BRANCH_2_1_X: . src/blocks/template src/blocks/template/conf src/blocks/template/java src/blocks/template/java/org src/blocks/template/java/org/apache src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/el src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/el/jexl src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/el/util src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/template src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/template/generation src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/template/script src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/template/tag src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/template/tag/samples src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/util src/blocks/template/samples src/blocks/template/test src/blocks/template/test/org src/blocks/template/test/org/apache src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/el src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/el/je! xl src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/el/util src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/template src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/template/generation src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/template/script src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/util
Date Wed, 01 Dec 2004 13:10:38 GMT
Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:

> Leszek Gawron wrote:
>
>> Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
>
>
> <snip/>
>
>>> Thanks for commiting the template stuff !
>>>
>>> But do you really think that it is worth the effort to keep 2.1.x 
>>> syncronized with trunk wrt template at this early stage of 
>>> development? I'd prefer to sync it when we are a little bit more 
>>> shure about what interfaces we should have and so on.
>>
>>
>> Fine by me. Still we can sync once a few revisions.
>
>
> We can do that, but then we have to change the code so that it is Java 
> 1.3 compatible (or just turn of compilation of the block in 2.1.x by 
> default). The code contains some java.nio stuff which IIRC not is 
> contained in 1.3.

Really, this should be developed in trunk, and then back-ported when it 
reaches a level of stability (unless we get 2.2 out quick enough :-) )

Trunk is where new stuff goes, IMO.

Regards, Upayavira



Mime
View raw message