cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Daniel Fagerstrom <>
Subject Re: svn commit: r109328 - in cocoon/branches/BRANCH_2_1_X: . src/blocks/template src/blocks/template/conf src/blocks/template/java src/blocks/template/java/org src/blocks/template/java/org/apache src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/el src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/el/jexl src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/el/util src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/template src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/template/generation src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/template/script src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/template/tag src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/template/tag/samples src/blocks/template/java/org/apache/cocoon/util src/blocks/template/samples src/blocks/template/test src/blocks/template/test/org src/blocks/template/test/org/apache src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/el src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/el/je! xl src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/el/util src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/template src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/template/generation src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/template/script src/blocks/template/test/org/apache/cocoon/util
Date Wed, 01 Dec 2004 13:06:50 GMT
Leszek Gawron wrote:

> Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:


>> Thanks for commiting the template stuff !
>> But do you really think that it is worth the effort to keep 2.1.x 
>> syncronized with trunk wrt template at this early stage of 
>> development? I'd prefer to sync it when we are a little bit more 
>> shure about what interfaces we should have and so on.
> Fine by me. Still we can sync once a few revisions.

We can do that, but then we have to change the code so that it is Java 
1.3 compatible (or just turn of compilation of the block in 2.1.x by 
default). The code contains some java.nio stuff which IIRC not is 
contained in 1.3.


View raw message