Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 16825 invoked from network); 24 Nov 2004 09:15:22 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Nov 2004 09:15:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 6038 invoked by uid 500); 24 Nov 2004 09:15:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 5766 invoked by uid 500); 24 Nov 2004 09:15:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 5752 invoked by uid 99); 24 Nov 2004 09:15:18 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [157.193.121.51] (HELO otsrv1.iic.ugent.be) (157.193.121.51) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 Nov 2004 01:15:13 -0800 Received: from [192.168.123.115] (host115 [192.168.123.115]) by otsrv1.iic.ugent.be (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id iAO9F3a15105 for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2004 10:15:03 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) In-Reply-To: <03f301c4d196$0651f2f0$a501a8c0@computer2> References: <209B9AE0-3C9B-11D9-99A4-000A958B684A@outerthought.org> <7b870341041123073648536046@mail.gmail.com> <03f301c4d196$0651f2f0$a501a8c0@computer2> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <53C96482-3DF9-11D9-A707-000A958B684A@outerthought.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Steven Noels Subject: Re: [ANN] Daisy 1.1 release Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 10:15:04 +0100 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On 23 Nov 2004, at 20:52, Andreas Kuckartz wrote: > Some people asked for a comparison when Daisy 1.0 was released but > this page is > still empty: > http://wiki.apache.org/cocoon-lenya/Comparisons Heh. I hate product comparisons with a passion, just as I hate filling out endless forms on http://tools.hartman-communicatie.nl/overzicht.html, http://cmsmatrix.org/ and perhaps some more. The reason I hate them is that proper comparisons are very hard to do, and most likely will be completely dependent on what you want to achieve. Also, these forms typically get filled in with a "marketing attitude" - which means truth is sometimes twisted, and future ambitions are being stated as if they are reality. With both projects being open source and readily available, and if someone is serious about a CMS project, I think people should go through the burden of installing one system on Day 1, another system on Day 2, and use Day 3 to decide what project fits best with their requirements. If you can't bare spending two days doing a proper assessment of systems against your needs, no way you need to opt for an open source CMS. -- Steven Noels http://outerthought.org/ Outerthought - Open Source Java & XML An Orixo Member Read my weblog at http://blogs.cocoondev.org/stevenn/ stevenn at outerthought.org stevenn at apache.org