Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <4193835C.4010305@reverycodes.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 10:21:00 -0500
From: Vadim Gritsenko <vadim@reverycodes.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (Windows/20041103)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Vote] Remove woody and portal-fw in 2.2?
References: 
 <939f0a1494fa73af1ab0028a.20041109135157.enycu.tbref@www.dslextreme.com>
    <33400.10.0.0.58.1100089233.squirrel@10.0.0.58>
    <41922752.20605@dslextreme.com> <41923C7B.5090106@reverycodes.com>
 <6db0af4ba55f5a82c8a.20041110080915.enycu.tbref@www.dslextreme.com>
 <4193393E.901@mobilebox.pl> <4193564C.1090009@upaya.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <4193564C.1090009@upaya.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Upayavira wrote:
> I thought we were working towards a single set of blocks shared between 
> both 2.1 and 2.2? If that is the case, we can't deprecate a block in 2.2 
> and not in 2.1, at least not at the moment. We'd need a cleverer build 
> system, say one that knows which blocks to include from within the 
> blocks repository.

We are not there yet, and some blocks differ between 2.1 and 2.2. Anyway, what's 
your vote? :)

Vadim