Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 73682 invoked from network); 10 Nov 2004 17:41:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Nov 2004 17:41:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 92967 invoked by uid 500); 10 Nov 2004 17:41:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 92892 invoked by uid 500); 10 Nov 2004 17:41:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 92879 invoked by uid 99); 10 Nov 2004 17:41:25 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [130.237.222.202] (HELO smtp.nada.kth.se) (130.237.222.202) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Wed, 10 Nov 2004 09:41:23 -0800 Received: from nada.kth.se (cvap80.nada.kth.se [130.237.218.93]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.nada.kth.se (8.12.10/8.12.1) with ESMTP id iAAHfKBD026117 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 10 Nov 2004 18:41:20 +0100 (MET) Message-ID: <419252C0.6080107@nada.kth.se> Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 18:41:20 +0100 From: Daniel Fagerstrom User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4.2) Gecko/20040308 X-Accept-Language: sv, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: XML support in Rhino 1.6 References: <41920B86.3060401@nada.kth.se> <41920FD6.2010908@apache.org> <419242F2.8020309@nada.kth.se> <41924C1E.6000803@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <41924C1E.6000803@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Reinhard Poetz wrote: > Daniel Fagerstrom wrote: > >> I have looked a little bit more on it. It doesn't seem to work with >> the Rhino jar in the SVN. Rhino recognize the E4X syntax but it >> cannot find the XML class that is needed. The xbean.jar must be >> present during compilation AFAICS, probably our version is compiled >> without it. Maybe Reinhard know? > > > It is compiled with it, but I haven't put the library into the > repository as I didn't know what it was used for and everything worked > as expected. > > Altough I don't feel very comfortable with having another ~2 megabyte > core reference :-( I agree with that. Maybe we can have an XMLBeans block that contains the lib and possibly some samples and nothing more. The STX block is like that. Anyway, we can try it out first. > I added it to our repository and a simple test worked for me Cool! Maybe I forgot something when I tried it, I will try again. > As trunk is considered alpha we can play with it and if we don't like > it it can be deleted. > > Anyway, it seems really powerful and I'm looking forward to hearing > from you more about it. Don't hold your breath while waiting ;) The convertor stuff and some CForms experiments related to that is higher up on my priority list. I'd also like to go back to the JXTG refactoring again. > Unfortunatly I don't have the time today to look deeper than a > "" into the details. That is good enough, now we know that it works. /Daniel