cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Reinhard Poetz <reinh...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Planning Cocoon's future
Date Tue, 23 Nov 2004 12:07:07 GMT
Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
> Reinhard Poetz wrote:
> 
>> After releasing Cocoon 2.1.6 it's time to plan our future. A few month 
>> ago we
>> updated our roadmap in SVN. According to this we agreed that 2.2 is a
>> consolidated version of 2.1.
>>
>> So what are the changes and what's their current status?
>> --------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> <snip/>
> 
>>  - deprecate XSP
>>    to be done (needs an alternative)
>>    Daniel, are you working on a JXTG 2.0?
> 
> 
> No, not yet. I sumarized my view of the results of the discussion this 
> far in a previous mail:
> 
>> The conclusion was IIRC, that we like JXTG but not it's implementation 
>> (to large and scary) and that we need the ability to add custom tags. 
>> The implementation would be easier to follow and more reusable if the 
>> object model was factored out (using Carsten's TemplateObjectHelper), 
>> factoring out the expression language and possibly make it plugable 
>> and writing the tags as custom tags.
>>
>> We don't want to complicate life for the users (and ourselves) by 
>> differ from JXTG whithout very good reasons, and in that case we 
>> should deprecate the things that we don't like. So the "new" template 
>> generator should include the JXTG tags.
> 
> 
> The main question now IMO is what tag framework we should base JXTG 2.0 
> on. The candidates that has been mentioned this far are: Jelly, the 
> taglib, Carsten's taglib and Jonas taglib (are there more alternatives). 
> I discussed Jelly with Carsten and the conclusion was that it doesn't 
> fit that well in Cocoon. I don't know Carsten's plans for his taglib. 
> Jonas need to some advertising of his taglib and explain how it relates 
> to the alternatives.
> 
> For the taglib I have not been able to find any documentation of how it 
> works and the design behind it (any pointers?), and have not found time 
> to read the code. Vadim used it in the faces block so it is probably 
> reasonably good. Vadim, can you (and other users of taglib), tell about 
> your experience from using it?
> 
> IMHO, if the taglib is good enough, the best approach for JXTG 2.0 would 
> be to refactor the JXTG tags to taglib tags, factor out the object model 
> and make the expression language plugable.

Sounds good. Does anybody feel responsible driving this effort so that we can 
depcrecate XSP in 2.2?

-- 
Reinhard

Mime
View raw message