cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Crossley <>
Subject Re: site update - please review
Date Mon, 22 Nov 2004 08:02:55 GMT
Upayavira wrote:
> David Crossley wrote:
>> Upayavira wrote:
>>> Okay. My request was more to do with "have I run Forrest right". I 
>>> should have made that more clear.
>> There are two aspects.
>> * The person who ran the 'forrest' command
>> would have seen the "Build Successful" note.
>> * Any of us can review Upayavira's staging site
>> to see if it "looks okay".
>> For the latter, i just glanced at a few pages
>> and it seems to be fine. I see from the dates
>> in the footers, that you updated both the
>> "top-level" site docs and the "2.1" docs ... good.
> Great. But, as you said elsewhere, I need to use Cocoon's 'build docs', 
> rather than 'forrest site', as Cocoon needs to prepare some source files 
> for Forrest.

Yes. The jars.xml and the generated component documentation
which is integrated with the Userdocs.

> I did eventually see "Build successful" from Forrest, after having 
> worked through a few validation issues.
> Thanks for checking this.

Anything that can help keep our docs more up-to-date.


View raw message