Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 11889 invoked from network); 12 Oct 2004 11:59:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Oct 2004 11:59:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 87716 invoked by uid 500); 12 Oct 2004 11:59:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 87578 invoked by uid 500); 12 Oct 2004 11:58:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 87533 invoked by uid 99); 12 Oct 2004 11:58:58 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: domain of ap-cocoon-dev@m.gmane.org designates 80.91.229.2 as permitted sender) Received: from [80.91.229.2] (HELO main.gmane.org) (80.91.229.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 04:58:56 -0700 Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CHLIr-0007RO-00 for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 13:58:53 +0200 Received: from host190-154.pool80204.interbusiness.it ([80.204.154.190]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 13:58:53 +0200 Received: from nicolaken by host190-154.pool80204.interbusiness.it with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 13:58:53 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: dev@cocoon.apache.org From: Nicola Ken Barozzi Subject: Re: [RT9 subversion pre commit hook Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 13:58:50 +0200 Lines: 20 Message-ID: References: <416A5F6E.2020900@apache.org> <9CA85E48-1B6F-11D9-98C6-000A95AF004E@apache.org> <416BBC51.2060000@apache.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: host190-154.pool80204.interbusiness.it User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en In-Reply-To: <416BBC51.2060000@apache.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.86.1.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Sender: news X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Torsten Curdt wrote: >> The problem is that not necessarily stastus changes are done in one >> commit, there is a different granularity in the two. This is the >> reason why some projects that were using commit message extraction >> systems are now also using a status file. > > where is the problem? > > do one commit without the magic > words and one with them. not > *all* changes have to go into > the status file. 'k, this is nice :-) -- Nicola Ken Barozzi nicolaken@apache.org - verba volant, scripta manent - (discussions get forgotten, just code remains) ---------------------------------------------------------------------