Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 73977 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2004 17:31:16 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Oct 2004 17:31:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 11735 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2004 17:31:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 11539 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2004 17:31:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 11521 invoked by uid 99); 22 Oct 2004 17:31:11 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [213.46.243.13] (HELO amsfep18-int.chello.nl) (213.46.243.13) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 10:31:11 -0700 Received: from [192.168.123.185] (really [24.132.246.122]) by amsfep18-int.chello.nl (InterMail vM.6.01.03.04 201-2131-111-106-20040729) with ESMTP id <20041022173107.NUKI3605.amsfep18-int.chello.nl@[192.168.123.185]> for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 19:31:07 +0200 Message-ID: <417943DA.5050904@dds.nl> Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 19:31:06 +0200 From: Rogier Peters User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Macintosh/20040913) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: VMWare host for us @apache.org References: <1098440594.22786.122.camel@ighp> <4178EF1B.1050404@dds.nl> <4179434C.6020500@dds.nl> In-Reply-To: <4179434C.6020500@dds.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Rogier Peters wrote: > Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > >> Le 22 oct. 04, � 13:29, Rogier Peters a �crit : >> >>> ...Although I agree completely that it's the accessability, not the >>> quality of the documentation that is lacking, i can't help but >>> hearing echoes of the GT cms-shootout ( bag of docs; heavy on search ). >>> Why use forrest and not daisy or hippo? >> >> >> >> I wanted to put Forrest as the first option for "loyalty" reasons, as >> the Forrest team has helped us a lot until now. But there are many >> options of course. >> >> But at this point we should be careful not to fall into the trap of >> discussing tools before agreing on the problem. >> >> -Bertrand > > You're right, actually I replied before reading oops, and then I pressed send before completing. before reading the whole discussion that is. Rogier