Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 47492 invoked from network); 16 Oct 2004 17:10:02 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Oct 2004 17:10:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 87804 invoked by uid 500); 16 Oct 2004 17:09:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 87742 invoked by uid 500); 16 Oct 2004 17:09:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 87729 invoked by uid 99); 16 Oct 2004 17:09:57 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,RCVD_BY_IP X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [66.51.199.81] (HELO mail5.dslextreme.com) (66.51.199.81) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with SMTP; Sat, 16 Oct 2004 10:09:57 -0700 Received: (qmail 18616 invoked from network); 16 Oct 2004 17:09:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO [192.168.10.10]) (66.51.196.164) by 192.168.8.93 with SMTP; Sat, 16 Oct 2004 17:09:55 +0000 Message-ID: <417155E2.1070209@dslextreme.com> Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2004 10:09:54 -0700 From: Ralph Goers User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: Flowscript bug??? References: <416FF2F9.2020207@juwimm.com> <4170052A.7010105@reverycodes.com> <41712263.9060503@reverycodes.com> In-Reply-To: <41712263.9060503@reverycodes.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiVirus: scanned for viruses by AMaViS 0.2.1 (http://amavis.org/) X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N FWIW, we had trouble getting Flowscript to work with Weblogic because weblogic had its own version of Rhino. Vadim Gritsenko wrote: > Luca Morandini wrote: > >> Vadim Gritsenko wrote: >> >>> Problem is that currently Flow session scope is not serializable. >>> WebLogic requires session attributes to be serializable (required >>> for clustering). >> >> >> >> I mean, is flow unusable on WebLogic ? >