Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 70516 invoked from network); 20 Oct 2004 13:57:41 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Oct 2004 13:57:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 36501 invoked by uid 500); 20 Oct 2004 13:57:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 36393 invoked by uid 500); 20 Oct 2004 13:57:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 36345 invoked by uid 99); 20 Oct 2004 13:57:36 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [157.193.121.51] (HELO otsrv1.iic.ugent.be) (157.193.121.51) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 06:57:34 -0700 Received: from [192.168.123.115] (host115 [192.168.123.115]) by otsrv1.iic.ugent.be (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i9KCuYN10074 for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 14:56:34 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) In-Reply-To: <41766D5A.1050100@apache.org> References: <417661F0.8000708@apache.org> <0AA84AF7-2299-11D9-BC00-000A958B684A@outerthought.org> <41766D5A.1050100@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <00086670-22A0-11D9-A6C0-000A958B684A@outerthought.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Steven Noels Subject: Re: ECM++ Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 15:57:37 +0200 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On 20 Oct 2004, at 15:51, Sylvain Wallez wrote: > But that should not refrain us (cocoon devs) to do what we feel the > need to in the trunk, even if that prevents other projects to update > their snapshots during an unstability period that may exist. If we end up +1-ing each other's +1s, I doubt Carsten will ever get to the action of actually committing his stuff. ;-) Which also translates into: yeah - please do proceed, and yes - we are sufficiently warned, and yes - we do NOT need headsups from cocoon-dev that this is a safe snapshot date, and yes - we acknowledge that HEAD can break at each update, even for months in a row. :-) -- Steven Noels http://outerthought.org/ Outerthought - Open Source Java & XML An Orixo Member Read my weblog at http://blogs.cocoondev.org/stevenn/ stevenn at outerthought.org stevenn at apache.org