cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Tony Collen <colle...@umn.edu>
Subject Re: svn commit: rev 55895 - cocoon/branches/BRANCH_2_1_X
Date Thu, 28 Oct 2004 21:53:18 GMT
tony@apache.org wrote:

> Author: tony
> Date: Thu Oct 28 14:51:15 2004
> New Revision: 55895
> 
> Modified:
>    cocoon/branches/BRANCH_2_1_X/blocks.properties
>    cocoon/branches/BRANCH_2_1_X/gump.xml
>    cocoon/branches/BRANCH_2_1_X/status.xml
> Log:
> deprecating the php block
> 
> Modified: cocoon/branches/BRANCH_2_1_X/blocks.properties
> ==============================================================================
> --- cocoon/branches/BRANCH_2_1_X/blocks.properties	(original)
> +++ cocoon/branches/BRANCH_2_1_X/blocks.properties	Thu Oct 28 14:51:15 2004
> @@ -72,7 +72,6 @@
>  #include.block.lucene=false
>  #include.block.naming=false
>  #include.block.paranoid=false
> -#include.block.php=false
>  #include.block.poi=false
>  #-----[dependency]: "portal" depends on "authentication-fw", "html", "session-fw".
>  #-----[dependency]: "portal" is needed by "faces".
> @@ -160,6 +159,7 @@
>  # For including one of them you have to set the exclude property into comment in
>  # blocks.properties.
>  
> +include.block.php=false
>  #-----[dependency]: "portal-fw" depends on "authentication-fw", "session-fw".
>  include.block.portal-fw=false
>  include.block.swf=false
> 
> Modified: cocoon/branches/BRANCH_2_1_X/gump.xml
> ==============================================================================
> --- cocoon/branches/BRANCH_2_1_X/gump.xml	(original)
> +++ cocoon/branches/BRANCH_2_1_X/gump.xml	Thu Oct 28 14:51:15 2004
> @@ -451,7 +451,7 @@
>      <nag from="Gump &lt;general@gump.apache.org&gt;" to="dev@cocoon.apache.org"/>
>    </project>
>  
> -  <project name="cocoon-block-php" status="stable">
> +  <project name="cocoon-block-php" status="deprecated">
>      <package>org.apache.cocoon</package>
>  
>      <ant target="gump-block">


Is this all that needed to be done in order to "correctly" deprecate the 
block, or is there something else I'm missing (e.g. a @deprecated tag on 
the PHPGenerator) ?

Tony


Mime
View raw message