cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stefano Mazzocchi <stef...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [RT] Some notes about the "Real Blocks" issue
Date Mon, 18 Oct 2004 15:31:01 GMT
Niclas Hedhman wrote:

> On Saturday 16 October 2004 04:55, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
> 
> 
>>Because they have been around forever *AND* they don't change their
>>contracts overnight. 
> 
> 
> Your talk is not entirely reflected by the actions of the community. I just 
> did a svn up on the 2.1 branch;
> 
> A  lib/endorsed/xalan-2.6.1-dev-20041008T0304.jar
> D  lib/endorsed/xalan-2.6.0.jar
> 
> Why does the 2.1 branch require a timestamped/snapshot version of Xalan, if 
> everything is so fine and dandy with it?

Damn, I am *NOT*. I missed that. We must not depend on timestamped jars 
for such important dependencies.

Antonio?

> Antonio makes the following motivation in the commit message;
> "Update xalan to 2.6.1-dev-20041008T0304"

Yeah, that's useless. <shrug/>

-- 
Stefano.


Mime
View raw message