cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Antonio Gallardo" <agalla...@agssa.net>
Subject Re: [RT] Some notes about the 'Real Blocks' issue
Date Tue, 19 Oct 2004 21:49:33 GMT
Stefano Mazzocchi dijo:
> Niclas Hedhman wrote:
>
>> On Saturday 16 October 2004 04:55, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Because they have been around forever *AND* they don't change their
>>>contracts overnight.
>>
>>
>> Your talk is not entirely reflected by the actions of the community. I
>> just
>> did a svn up on the 2.1 branch;
>>
>> A  lib/endorsed/xalan-2.6.1-dev-20041008T0304.jar
>> D  lib/endorsed/xalan-2.6.0.jar
>>
>> Why does the 2.1 branch require a timestamped/snapshot version of Xalan,
>> if
>> everything is so fine and dandy with it?
>
> Damn, I am *NOT*. I missed that. We must not depend on timestamped jars
> for such important dependencies.
>
> Antonio?

Hi:

I think this mail could answer:

http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=109822205028606&w=2

>> Antonio makes the following motivation in the commit message;
>> "Update xalan to 2.6.1-dev-20041008T0304"
>
> Yeah, that's useless. <shrug/>

I agree.

But, What can I do? It was at hackathon with a lot of interesting people
speaking around! ;-)

Best Regards,

Antonio Gallardo

Mime
View raw message