cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From bugzi...@apache.org
Subject DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31646] New: - ParallelContentAggregator, multithreaded aggregating
Date Mon, 11 Oct 2004 15:11:38 GMT
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31646>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31646

ParallelContentAggregator, multithreaded aggregating

           Summary: ParallelContentAggregator, multithreaded aggregating
           Product: Cocoon 2
           Version: 2.1.5
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Other
            Status: NEW
          Severity: Enhancement
          Priority: Other
         Component: sitemap components
        AssignedTo: dev@cocoon.apache.org
        ReportedBy: cgaffga@triplemind.com


I didn't wanted to send a patch for that. The code is poorly documented nor 
tested under many circumtances, old license, etc. etc. It was just a 
workaround for a problem we had.

But we use it in production environment with about 350.000 pages a day. So, 
for my usecase it's stable. And if you suggest to send it as a patch, I do. 
Perheaps somebody finishes my work and we'll have it in the next version of 
cocoon.

In addition to my ParallelContentAggregator class I have a version called 
TonyContentAggregator. I can't remember if Tony did this, it was inspired by 
Tony or whatelse. I also attached thisone as patch.

So, see attachements for the javacode.

regards
Christoph


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ralph Goers" <Ralph.Goers@dslextreme.com>
To: <users@cocoon.apache.org>
Sent: Monday, October 11, 2004 4:37 PM
Subject: Re: aggregate takes too much time


> Why not submit this as a patch?  Then we can all see it.
> 
> Christoph Gaffga wrote:
> 
> >we also had a problem with slow aggregates. We solved it by changing the
> >Aggregator so it works in a multithraded mode.
> >
> >I don't know if it increases the perfomcance in your case because you are
> >only aggregating simple xml files from the filesystem. But in our case (the
> >aggragated parts are not static) it increases perfomance dramaticly.
> >
> >If you interested in it, I can send you our javacode for the
> >ParallelContentAggregator.
> >
> >regards
> >Christoph
> >  
> >
> 
>

Mime
View raw message