cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Pier Fumagalli <>
Subject Re: FIXME in IncludeTransformer [Was: Re: Adding Files to Subversion]
Date Tue, 28 Sep 2004 08:39:13 GMT
On 27 Sep 2004, at 23:43, Conal Tuohy wrote:
> Pier Fumagalli wrote:
>> I was thinking about one thing... The one thing that troubles
>> us is the
>> "request". That introduce a degree of variability that (i
>> don't know to
>> what degree), might be counter-productive to analyze and cache...
>> What about if we were doing "subrequest"s, much like in Apache... I
>> mean, why making the "included" request inherit all the
>> varible stuff?
>> Wouldn't it be simply easier to create a new request/response
>> and start
>> from a clean status.
>> Then we could re-create the request by something like:
>> <incl:include src="proto://whatever">
>>    <incl:param name="parameterName">value</incl:param>
>> </incl:include>
> There's the "raw" protocol which does this.
> I like it, because it isolates those internal pipeline calls from the
> full request environment - it means that the URI is a full 
> specification
> of their behaviour. I guess there might be cases where you want the 
> full
> request available to the internal pipeline though, and it may be "too
> much hassle" to marshall all the necessary parameters to the internal
> pipeline call, as you indicate above.

Thanks, that I didn't know... Since the WIKI moved off to that MoinMoin 
crap, I seriously tend to ignore it a lot more...


View raw message