Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 95259 invoked from network); 11 Aug 2004 12:59:55 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Aug 2004 12:59:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 22063 invoked by uid 500); 11 Aug 2004 12:59:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 21878 invoked by uid 500); 11 Aug 2004 12:59:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 21777 invoked by uid 99); 11 Aug 2004 12:59:37 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=10.0 tests=URIBL_SBL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [217.160.230.40] (HELO mout.perfora.net) (217.160.230.40) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.27.1) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 05:59:36 -0700 Received: from minotaur.apache.org[209.237.227.194] (helo=[127.0.0.1]) by mrelay.perfora.net with ESMTP (Nemesis), id 0MKyxe-1BushY2gyz-0001su; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 08:59:32 -0400 X-Provags-ID: perfora.net abuse@perfora.net e2e4156964dfbcc4c642ec658fa7f9b9 Message-ID: <411A1832.9030409@reverycodes.com> Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 08:59:30 -0400 From: Vadim Gritsenko User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040616 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: XMLDB transformer and deleting collections References: <56B424F9FF92CE4F9501860E89CA922E01647257@ayems01.aeroint.com> In-Reply-To: <56B424F9FF92CE4F9501860E89CA922E01647257@ayems01.aeroint.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Tracy.Hartley@aeroint.com wrote: > Just found that I couldn't delete a collection using the XMLDB transformer, > and on checking the source code there was no functionality to do this ... I > added the necessary code and it seems to work OK, but I was wondering if > there was any reason this wasn't included? The only reason is resource availability. As soon as somebody gets to it (patch in BugZilla), it will get included. Vadim