Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Date: 6 Aug 2004 07:52:28 -0000
Message-ID: <20040806075228.23572.qmail@nagoya.betaversion.org>
From: bugzilla@apache.org
To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Cc: 
Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30506]  -
    [PATCH] Email validation is not RFC2822 compliant

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30506>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30506

[PATCH] Email validation is not RFC2822 compliant


------- Additional Comments From bruno@outerthought.org  2004-08-06 07:52 -------
I'm not sure how to interpret the comment "should check for all valid email
addresses": does this mean there are valid email addresses that do not pass the
current test?


PS: I don't like making cforms depedent on javamail just for this little check,
and I think there are also licensing problems with javamail, its source code
doesn't seem to be available either, so it's unclear to me exactly how liberal
or strict their parsing is.