cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Glen Ezkovich <g...@hard-bop.com>
Subject Re: [Proposal] Add pass-through capability to mounted pipelines
Date Mon, 30 Aug 2004 23:31:47 GMT

On Aug 30, 2004, at 12:19 PM, Giacomo Pati wrote:

> On Mon, 30 Aug 2004, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
>
>> Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
>>
>> <snip/>
>>
>>> I propose that we add the passthrough='true|[false]' attribute to 
>>> make it possible for mounts not to necessarily halt processing if no 
>>> match is found.
>>> The proposed element for it is the <mount> node, so that the base 
>>> sitemap has the say on whether it wants to make the subsitemap 
>>> completely responsible or not of the subsequent processing. The 
>>> default behavior would be identical to what we have now.
>>
>>
>> +1, but the "passthrough" name doesn't seem clear to me.
>>
>> Other names that come to mind, but aren't satisfying either are 
>> "come-back", "delegate", "allow-return"...
>
> How about "final".

To much like Java's final.

maybe return-on-fail or return-no-match


>
> -- 
> Giacomo Pati
> Otego AG, Switzerland - http://www.otego.com
> Orixo, the XML business alliance - http://www.orixo.com
>
>
>

Glen Ezkovich
HardBop Consulting
glen at hard-bop.com
http://www.hard-bop.com - new and improved site coming soon



A Proverb for Paranoids:
"If they can get you asking the wrong questions, they don't have to 
worry about answers."
- Thomas Pynchon Gravity's Rainbow


Mime
View raw message