Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-63883-apmail-cocoon-dev-archive=cocoon.apache.org@cocoon.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 9722 invoked from network); 29 Jul 2004 19:41:58 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199)
  by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Jul 2004 19:41:58 -0000
Received: (qmail 74056 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jul 2004 19:41:26 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org
Received: (qmail 73918 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jul 2004 19:41:25 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:dev-help@cocoon.apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@cocoon.apache.org>
list-post: <mailto:dev@cocoon.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org
Received: (qmail 73820 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jul 2004 19:41:24 -0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0
	tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received: from [195.130.132.44] (HELO poros.telenet-ops.be) (195.130.132.44)
  by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.27.1) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 12:41:23 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by poros.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 859F93BC07C
	for <dev@cocoon.apache.org>; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 21:41:20 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from gabriel.local (D5E009B7.kabel.telenet.be [213.224.9.183])
	by poros.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 203263BC168
	for <dev@cocoon.apache.org>; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 21:41:20 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by gabriel.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7153642DBE4
	for <dev@cocoon.apache.org>; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 21:41:19 +0200 (CEST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v618)
In-Reply-To: <41094001.1090202@apache.org>
References: <41094001.1090202@apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Message-Id: <42AC1121-E197-11D8-B58F-000A958B684A@outerthought.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Steven Noels <stevenn@outerthought.org>
Subject: Re: [proposal] Private Branches
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 21:41:18 +0200
To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.618)
X-Virus-Checked: Checked
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

On 29 Jul 2004, at 20:20, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:

> My proposal is to create a private branch for every committer that 
> wants it and place it in
>
>  http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cocoon/private/[id]

> Thoughts?

I know I'm at the verge of becoming a traditionalist, but IMHO we 
should never create personal freewheeling areas for reasons of false 
ownership feelings and oversight. Who has still some sort of 
semi-complete knowledge coverage over the Cocoon source trees? Wouldn't 
that become even harder with these private directories?

We should be able to contain such stuff into a clearly marked, but 
not-tied-to-a-person area. The ASF infrastructure shouldn't serve as a 
personal backup solution, no?

</Steven>
-- 
Steven Noels                            http://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source Java & XML            An Orixo Member
Read my weblog at            http://blogs.cocoondev.org/stevenn/
stevenn at outerthought.org                stevenn at apache.org