From dev-return-62877-apmail-cocoon-dev-archive=cocoon.apache.org@cocoon.apache.org Thu Jul 01 13:55:02 2004
Return-Path: <dev-return-62877-apmail-cocoon-dev-archive=cocoon.apache.org@cocoon.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 23682 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2004 13:55:02 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199)
  by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jul 2004 13:55:02 -0000
Received: (qmail 18262 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2004 13:54:34 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org
Received: (qmail 18110 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2004 13:54:33 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:dev-help@cocoon.apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@cocoon.apache.org>
list-post: <mailto:dev@cocoon.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org
Received: (qmail 18065 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jul 2004 13:54:32 -0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0
	tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received: from [80.91.224.249] (HELO main.gmane.org) (80.91.224.249)
  by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.27.1) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Jul 2004 06:54:32 -0700
Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1Bg218-0008BN-00
	for <dev@cocoon.apache.org>; Thu, 01 Jul 2004 15:54:22 +0200
Received: from mail.ewerk.com ([217.69.240.162])
        by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
        id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
        for <dev@cocoon.apache.org>; Thu, 01 Jul 2004 15:54:22 +0200
Received: from joerg.heinicke by mail.ewerk.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
        id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
        for <dev@cocoon.apache.org>; Thu, 01 Jul 2004 15:54:22 +0200
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
From: Joerg Heinicke <joerg.heinicke@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: question on UnionBinding
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 13:54:20 +0000 (UTC)
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <loom.20040701T154946-59@post.gmane.org>
References: <loom.20040701T124814-782@post.gmane.org> <20040701140926.GO29256@keow.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/)
X-Loom-IP: 217.69.240.162 (Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040616)
Sender: news <news@sea.gmane.org>
X-Virus-Checked: Checked
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

Tim Larson <tim <at> keow.org> writes:

> > At the moment the UnionBinding behaves just like a ContextBinding, all sub
> > bindings are processed.
> 
> I do not have time to dig in the code right now, but this looks like a bug
> (oversight) that needs fixed.  Only the current case should be processed.

Thanks for the confirmation.
The code is quite easy "iterate over all sub bindings":

Binding[] subBindings = getChildBindings();
if (subBindings != null) {
    int size = subBindings.length;
    for (int i = 0; i < size; i++) {
        subBindings[i].saveFormToModel(unionWidget, subContext);
    }
}

I will see if I can fix it.

Joerg