Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 87297 invoked from network); 4 Jun 2004 18:07:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Jun 2004 18:07:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 88758 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jun 2004 18:07:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 88650 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jun 2004 18:07:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 88619 invoked by uid 99); 4 Jun 2004 18:07:39 -0000 Received: from [212.8.217.2] (HELO mail.s-und-n.de) (212.8.217.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.27.1) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Jun 2004 11:07:39 -0700 Received: from notes.sundn.de (ntsrv5.sundn.de [10.10.2.10]) by mail.s-und-n.de (postfix) with ESMTP id 861EE19F5EF for ; Fri, 4 Jun 2004 20:07:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hw0386 ([192.168.2.31]) by notes.sundn.de (Lotus Domino Release 6.5) with ESMTP id 2004060419580943-28225 ; Fri, 4 Jun 2004 19:58:09 +0200 From: "Carsten Ziegeler" To: Subject: RE: error handling Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2004 20:06:19 +0200 Organization: S&N AG MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 In-Reply-To: <40C08AE0.2090905@vafer.org> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Thread-Index: AcRKQSZab4Ld9GcdSny7lDvYYSttSQAHTJzA X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on PBSN1/Systeme und Netzwerke(Release 6.5|September 26, 2003) at 04.06.2004 19:58:19, Serialize by Router on PBSN1/Systeme und Netzwerke(Release 6.5|September 26, 2003) at 04.06.2004 19:58:19, Serialize complete at 04.06.2004 19:58:19 Message-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Torsten Curdt wrote: > > >> ...What about... > >> > >> > >> > >> our current behaviour would be "external". > >> I would like to have "always" andt the "internal" option > might be FS > >> ;) > > > > > > +1 for the declaration, looks clean enough! > > Carsten, I'd really like to takle this ASAP. > We are currently using a *very* ugly work around. > Yes, yes, do it - you don't have to wait for my +1, I'm just a little committer who likes it when everyone ignores him. Silence always means: I'm not against it. Carsten