Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 63033 invoked from network); 30 Jun 2004 21:38:48 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Jun 2004 21:38:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 23588 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2004 21:38:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 23479 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2004 21:38:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 23379 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jun 2004 21:38:36 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [81.209.148.130] (HELO dd2020.kasserver.com) (81.209.148.130) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.27.1) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 14:38:35 -0700 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (linux01.gwdg.de [134.76.13.21]) by dd2020.kasserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3731EF268 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 23:37:52 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <40E33313.5050309@vafer.org> Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 23:39:31 +0200 From: Torsten Curdt User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.1 (Windows/20040626) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Move to servlet spec 2.3 [was RE: Can we compile against servlet spec 2.3?] References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.84.2.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > As requested by Joerg, let's vote if we move to servlet spec 2.3 > as the base for Cocoon. I think all important servlet engines > support this version, so this shouldn't really be a problem. > > So, please cast your votes: > > Here is my +1 ...and here is my +1 cheers -- Torsten