Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 24647 invoked from network); 9 Jun 2004 19:29:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Jun 2004 19:29:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 77843 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2004 19:29:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 77813 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2004 19:29:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 77797 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jun 2004 19:29:58 -0000 Received: from [213.165.64.20] (HELO mail.gmx.net) (213.165.64.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.27.1) with SMTP; Wed, 09 Jun 2004 12:29:58 -0700 Received: (qmail 15127 invoked by uid 65534); 9 Jun 2004 19:29:36 -0000 Received: from a183069.studnetz.uni-leipzig.de (EHLO gmx.de) (139.18.183.69) by mail.gmx.net (mp009) with SMTP; 09 Jun 2004 21:29:36 +0200 X-Authenticated: #3483660 Message-ID: <40C76554.4000804@gmx.de> Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2004 21:30:28 +0200 From: Joerg Heinicke User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113 X-Accept-Language: de-de, de, en-us, en-gb, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: Heads up, MSIE weirdness References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On 09.06.2004 20:50, Berin Loritsch wrote: > Just an FYI, MSIE (known for adherance to standards, yeah right) does > not behave in a rational manner when it sees the "XML" header even if > the rest of the system is HTML. Case and point is the linotype sample > included with Cocoon 2.1.5. MSIE identifies it as an HTML page, but > because Cocoon 2.1.5 includes the header > > > > at the top, MSIE (version 6) renders it as XML. If that header were > not there, everything would be ok. Yes, I already came across this and files it as bug: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29009. What's strange: the start page is also XHTML and it works. Joerg