Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 76152 invoked from network); 6 Jun 2004 02:36:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Jun 2004 02:36:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 41767 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2004 02:36:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 41702 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2004 02:36:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 41686 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jun 2004 02:36:23 -0000 Received: from [160.94.23.34] (HELO mhub-m4.tc.umn.edu) (160.94.23.34) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.27.1) with ESMTP; Sat, 05 Jun 2004 19:36:23 -0700 Received: from umn.edu (c-66-41-107-104.mn.client2.attbi.com [66.41.107.104] (may be forged)) by mhub-m4.tc.umn.edu with ESMTP for dev@cocoon.apache.org; Sat, 5 Jun 2004 21:36:12 -0500 (CDT) X-Umn-Remote-Mta: [N] c-66-41-107-104.mn.client2.attbi.com [66.41.107.104] #+HF+TS+AU Message-ID: <40C28381.1050706@umn.edu> Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2004 21:37:53 -0500 From: Tony Collen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: Redesigning the Samples References: <40C0DC41.9070508@umn.edu> <1086401336.31520.18181.camel@ighp> In-Reply-To: <1086401336.31520.18181.camel@ighp> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N David Crossley wrote: > Erk, i do not want to pour water on your efforts, but i was > already really happy with the original design. The only > thing that i would have changed would be to make the top > part of the page be even more compact. Welp, my personal opinion was that (putting it nicely) the page was lacking in the graphic design department. So I did something I thought was reasonable. I see people's arguments about dilluting the Cocoon "brand". I can understand this because I worked in an advertising agency for a few years, and many years ago I came very close to going to school for Graphic Design rather than Computer Science. I don't want to jeopardize the Cocoon brand by any means. I would like to express my concern about wanting to have a more professional image. Not necessarily more corporate looking, but I think a more polished look would greatly help the project, which led to my work. One problem that I encounter a lot when building web sites and doing graphic design for people is that if a design is put in front of 50 people, you'll get 50 different suggestions as to how to make it better or more appealing. This makes it *very* hard to do something that everyone will agree to fully. I've found a few ways around this situation: - Ignore them, since you know better than they do (arrogant) - Try to appease everybody fully (doesn't work) - Take their suggestions into consideration, but keep working forward (useful, practical) - Try to compromise between what people want and what you think should happen (best IMO) Obviously, I favor the compromise route. Like I said, the page design bugged me enough to do something about it. Now I think we should find some sort of a compromise that won't dillute the Cocoon "brand" but try to snazz up the pages as much as possible, without pissing people off. WDYT? Regards, Tony, who thought long and hard over the weekend about this message, and was originally angry about the poor reaction but got over it since he shouldn't take people's reactions as an attack against him personally. P.S. The cocoon2.ai Illustrator file in the current CVS won't even open in the latest version of Illustrator. This is bad because if we lose this file, we face losing original artwork.