Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 57080 invoked from network); 4 Jun 2004 02:04:47 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Jun 2004 02:04:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 82741 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jun 2004 02:05:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 82715 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jun 2004 02:05:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 82700 invoked by uid 99); 4 Jun 2004 02:05:01 -0000 Received: from [217.160.230.41] (HELO mout.perfora.net) (217.160.230.41) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.27.1) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Jun 2004 19:05:01 -0700 Received: from 209.237.227.194 (helo=[127.0.0.1]) by mrelay.perfora.net with ESMTP (Nemesis), id 1BW44M-0gPQ-0MKyxe-0005se; Thu, 03 Jun 2004 22:04:30 -0400 Message-ID: <40BFD8AD.3020405@reverycodes.com> Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2004 22:04:29 -0400 From: Vadim Gritsenko User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040514 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: error handling References: <40BF27B5.6020906@vafer.org> In-Reply-To: <40BF27B5.6020906@vafer.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Torsten Curdt wrote: > I have an interal pipeline which sometimes > throws an exception due to broken links. > > > > > > > > > > > And another one using it > > > > --> calls the intenal pipeline > ... > > > Using the first pipeline works just > fine. Exceptions are being caught and > a default xml file is being presented > instead. > > Unfortunately using it through the > second pipeline (through the cinclude > transformer) brings up the exception. > > Anyone a clue what's happing here? IIRC, last first friday we had a chat with Carsten about adding an attribute to the or to the which will indicate what behavior is needed in case of internal request: throw exception or process . Carsten? Vadim