Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 79421 invoked from network); 1 Jun 2004 09:43:09 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jun 2004 09:43:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 98182 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2004 09:43:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 98112 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2004 09:43:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 98098 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2004 09:43:05 -0000 Received: from [212.85.125.162] (HELO v07274.home.net.pl) (212.85.125.162) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.27.1) with SMTP; Tue, 01 Jun 2004 02:43:05 -0700 Received: from sc250.internetdsl.tpnet.pl (HELO ?192.168.1.22?) (lgawron.mobilebox@home@80.55.80.250) by matrix15.home.net.pl with SMTP; 1 Jun 2004 09:42:42 -0000 Message-ID: <40BC4F92.2040904@mobilebox.pl> Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2004 11:42:42 +0200 From: Leszek Gawron User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.6 (Windows/20040502) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: JXTG and caching References: <40BBBA14.2030402@mobilebox.pl> <40BC39CA.7070305@apache.org> <40BC426D.3020808@mobilebox.pl> <40BC46A9.8010304@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <40BC46A9.8010304@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Sylvain Wallez wrote: > Well, although not the nicest construct, I still prefer it to the one > you initially proposed, as the cache information is still triggered by > the generator, even if the corresponding code is in the flowscript. Right, I didn't think of that. Your solution is a "pull" while mine is "push" one. -- Leszek Gawron