Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Message-ID: <35633.10.0.0.5.1087415370.squirrel@10.0.0.5>
In-Reply-To: <40D0A31C.8030708@upaya.co.uk>
References: <40D07D24.1090309@reverycodes.com> <40D07FF1.9070907@umn.edu>
    <35456.10.0.0.5.1087411978.squirrel@10.0.0.5>
    <40D0A31C.8030708@upaya.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 13:49:30 -0600 (CST)
Subject: Re: Removing groovy
From: "Antonio Gallardo" <agallardo@agssa.net>
To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a-0.f1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Importance: Normal

Upayavira dijo:
> Antonio Gallardo wrote:
>
>>Tony Collen dijo:
>>
>>
>>>Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Hi,
>>>>
>>>>I'm not sure (yet) where Groovy is used - but it has to be removed from
>>>>core Cocoon, lib/optional, into some block. Reason is simple - Cocoon
>>>>supports JDK1.3, and Groovy - not. Either JDK1.3 support should go, or
>>>>Groovy should go (into the block, at least).
>>>>
>>>>Opinions?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>Move into its own block, mark as unstable (and possibly disabled by
>>>default).
>>>
>>>Perhaps we can think of losing 1.3 support once 1.5 is finalized.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>Yep. AFAIK, it was already decided for the next version.
>>
>>
> No, it was decided for 2.2, but 2.1.x will always have JDK1.3 support.
> That is how I remember it.

Yep. We are now on 2.2-dev :-D

Best Regards,

Antonio Gallardo