cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Carsten Ziegeler" <cziege...@s-und-n.de>
Subject RE: New Rhino.jar
Date Mon, 28 Jun 2004 06:07:31 GMT
Can we keep the source separate from the jar? I don't want to
have the rhino (etc) sources in every deployed Cocoon application :)

Carsten

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sylvain Wallez [mailto:sylvain@apache.org] 
> Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 7:59 AM
> To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
> Subject: Re: New Rhino.jar
> 
> Antonio Gallardo wrote:
> 
> >Hi:
> >
> >The new submitted rhino lib is 2 times bigger than the older one. I 
> >noted it has included the source files.
> >  
> >
> 
> When we discussed the inclusion of sources of Cocoon-produced 
> jars, several people expressed the desire to have sources 
> included in third-party jars produced from CVS snapshots. 
> That's what I did for 
> rhino+cont.
> 
> >Is this the new approach? Will we end with a 160 MB Cocoon?
> >  
> >
> 
> This size is unlikely to be reached if we apply this policy 
> only to third-party library *snapshots*. Now if even this is 
> considered to big, I can rebuild rhino without sources.
> 
> Sylvain
> 
> -- 
> Sylvain Wallez                                  Anyware Technologies
> http://www.apache.org/~sylvain           http://www.anyware-tech.com
> { XML, Java, Cocoon, OpenSource }*{ Training, Consulting, Projects }
> 
> 


Mime
View raw message