Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 62124 invoked from network); 17 May 2004 16:37:55 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 17 May 2004 16:37:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 182 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2004 16:37:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 99854 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2004 16:37:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 99629 invoked by uid 98); 17 May 2004 16:37:21 -0000 Received: from u.cei@cbim.it by hermes.apache.org by uid 82 with qmail-scanner-1.20 (clamuko: 0.70. Clear:RC:0(212.131.130.82):. Processed in 0.24232 secs); 17 May 2004 16:37:21 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From: u.cei@cbim.it via hermes.apache.org X-Qmail-Scanner: 1.20 (Clear:RC:0(212.131.130.82):. Processed in 0.24232 secs) Received: from unknown (HELO mail.cbim.it) (212.131.130.82) by hermes.apache.org with SMTP; 17 May 2004 16:37:21 -0000 Received: from cuprouter.cbim.it (cuprouter.cbim.it [192.168.4.10]) by mail.cbim.it (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id i4HH7tC05091 for ; Mon, 17 May 2004 19:07:55 +0200 Received: from cbim.it (caterina.cbim.it [192.168.4.42]) by cuprouter.cbim.it (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA13899 for ; Mon, 17 May 2004 18:38:40 +0200 Message-ID: <40A8EA27.5010406@cbim.it> Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 18:36:55 +0200 From: Ugo Cei Organization: C.B.I.M. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031016 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: [RT] Serviceable considered harmful (was Re: XSP not working in CVS head?) References: <36700.10.0.0.5.1084790016.squirrel@ags01.agsoftware.dnsalias.com> <40A8C005.5040508@apache.org> <40A8CB63.1060604@cbim.it> <40A8CEB2.10800@apache.org> <40A8D3BE.3090600@cbim.it> <40A8DCDC.8070008@apache.org> <40A8E1AF.7080708@cbim.it> <40A8E773.8030904@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <40A8E773.8030904@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: hermes.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Sylvain Wallez wrote: > The "byType" autowiring is more or less what I was talking about, but > requires the wiring to become explicit as soon as more than one > implementation exist in the system, which actually makes it less useful. I see what you mean. I think there are concepts in Spring (and other containers) that should be incorporated in the design of Cocoon 3, even if their actual implementation is different. OTOH, it will probably take *years* for that design to solidify and who knows how Spring will change in that timeframe. If we can give them some inputs, maybe we can help shape it to better fit our needs. > They have an impressive doc! There's also a book coming out soon [1]. Ugo [1] http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0764558315/beblogging-20?ref=nosim