Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 63561 invoked from network); 17 May 2004 14:34:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 17 May 2004 14:34:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 33246 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2004 14:34:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 33132 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2004 14:34:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 33010 invoked by uid 98); 17 May 2004 14:34:01 -0000 Received: from u.cei@cbim.it by hermes.apache.org by uid 82 with qmail-scanner-1.20 (clamuko: 0.70. Clear:RC:0(212.131.130.82):. Processed in 0.318826 secs); 17 May 2004 14:34:01 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From: u.cei@cbim.it via hermes.apache.org X-Qmail-Scanner: 1.20 (Clear:RC:0(212.131.130.82):. Processed in 0.318826 secs) Received: from unknown (HELO mail.cbim.it) (212.131.130.82) by hermes.apache.org with SMTP; 17 May 2004 14:34:00 -0000 Received: from cuprouter.cbim.it (cuprouter.cbim.it [192.168.4.10]) by mail.cbim.it (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id i4HF4gC03991 for ; Mon, 17 May 2004 17:04:42 +0200 Received: from cbim.it (caterina.cbim.it [192.168.4.42]) by cuprouter.cbim.it (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA11174 for ; Mon, 17 May 2004 16:35:27 +0200 Message-ID: <40A8CD47.7040802@cbim.it> Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 16:33:43 +0200 From: Ugo Cei Organization: C.B.I.M. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031016 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: Revert JCS, Re: XSP not working in CVS head? References: <40A8C198.3050608@cbim.it> <40A8C570.8010007@cbim.it> <43360.10.0.0.5.1084802984.squirrel@ags01.agsoftware.dnsalias.com> In-Reply-To: <43360.10.0.0.5.1084802984.squirrel@ags01.agsoftware.dnsalias.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: hermes.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Antonio Gallardo wrote: >>of luck unless we modify EHCache (shouldn't be too much work, but we >>should ask the EHCache developers before doing a fork). > > yet another fork? How many forks we will have for Cocoon: > > Rhino > Jisp (evaluated as a solution at a time). > Now ehcache? > > It is going to be very hard to mantain.... I think it is a bad idea. Yes. It's a very bad idea. I'm sorry if I wasn't very clear. What I meant to say is: "we should ask the EHCache developers /instead of/ doing a fork". I don't advocate forking it unless it's the last resort. But if we must, keep in mind that EHCache is just 11 classes (+2 for the Hibernate plugin, which we don't need) with a comprehensive test suite, so if push comes to shove, we would have no problems maintaining it ourselves. Ugo