Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 12652 invoked from network); 14 May 2004 16:15:19 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 14 May 2004 16:15:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 75730 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2004 16:15:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 75522 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2004 16:15:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 75288 invoked by uid 98); 14 May 2004 16:15:20 -0000 Received: from joerg.heinicke@gmx.de by hermes.apache.org by uid 82 with qmail-scanner-1.20 (clamuko: 0.70. Clear:RC:0(213.165.64.20):. Processed in 0.156422 secs); 14 May 2004 16:15:20 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From: joerg.heinicke@gmx.de via hermes.apache.org X-Qmail-Scanner: 1.20 (Clear:RC:0(213.165.64.20):. Processed in 0.156422 secs) Received: from unknown (HELO mail.gmx.net) (213.165.64.20) by hermes.apache.org with SMTP; 14 May 2004 16:15:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 31333 invoked by uid 65534); 14 May 2004 16:14:57 -0000 Received: from a183069.studnetz.uni-leipzig.de (EHLO gmx.de) (139.18.183.69) by mail.gmx.net (mp012) with SMTP; 14 May 2004 18:14:57 +0200 X-Authenticated: #3483660 Message-ID: <40A4F099.4040904@gmx.de> Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 18:15:21 +0200 From: Joerg Heinicke User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113 X-Accept-Language: de-de, de, en-us, en-gb, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: [vote] Reschedule the release References: <40A4DB95.90908@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <40A4DB95.90908@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: hermes.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On 14.05.2004 16:45, Sylvain Wallez wrote: >> So, what do you think about: >> - switching to EHCache now +1 > even if EHCache is not as "ASF-friendly" as JCS (referring to David's > post) ?? >> - testing it in the next days +1 >> - stick to the code freeze of course +1 >> - release on monday/tuesday if no issues arise -0 > -0. Same as Ugo here : let's test it a few more days. +1 Joerg