Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-60689-apmail-cocoon-dev-archive=cocoon.apache.org@cocoon.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 6602 invoked from network); 9 May 2004 21:10:11 -0000
Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12)
  by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 9 May 2004 21:10:11 -0000
Received: (qmail 83351 invoked by uid 500); 9 May 2004 21:09:55 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org
Received: (qmail 82894 invoked by uid 500); 9 May 2004 21:09:52 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:dev-help@cocoon.apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@cocoon.apache.org>
list-post: <mailto:dev@cocoon.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org
Received: (qmail 82881 invoked from network); 9 May 2004 21:09:52 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO warden.diginsite.com) (208.29.163.248)
  by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 9 May 2004 21:09:52 -0000
Received: from wlvims01.diginsite.com by warden.diginsite.com
          via smtpd (for daedalus.apache.org [208.185.179.12]) with SMTP;
 Sun, 9 May 2004 14:09:58 -0700
Received: by calexc01.diginsite.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72)
	id <KST3S29F>; Sun, 9 May 2004 14:08:48 -0700
Message-ID: <31DF72A980E5D511B48C000102BD8685061DB3D4@calexc01.diginsite.com>
From: Ralph Goers <Ralph.Goers@digitalinsight.com>
To: "'dev@cocoon.apache.org'" <dev@cocoon.apache.org>
Subject: [VOTE] RE: LogKitLoggerManager
Date: Sun, 9 May 2004 14:08:47 -0700 
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72)
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

Yes, this change is backward compatible with 2.1.4, but not with the version
Carsten checked in last week.  I'd appreciate a vote to have this patch
applied.

Ralph

-----Original Message-----
From: Joerg Heinicke [mailto:joerg.heinicke@gmx.de] 
Sent: Sunday, May 09, 2004 1:52 PM
To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Subject: Re: LogKitLoggerManager

On 09.05.2004 19:25, Ralph Goers wrote:

> I've submitted patch 28860. I realize this is after the code freeze, but
I'd
> prefer to see this patch instead of the current code. If 2.1.5 goes out
with
> the current code we would have to maintain the current behavior of
> logger-type.

I guess it's completely backwards compatible (same default behaviour and 
so on). Then it can go in, but we must vote about it. It's best if you 
start the vote yourself. But IMO we should not wait 72 h for that vote 
as we would have only Thursday to test it. 36 h are enough for this case 
IMO.

Joerg