Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 39470 invoked from network); 10 May 2004 04:45:35 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 10 May 2004 04:45:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 5801 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2004 04:36:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 5497 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2004 04:36:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 5406 invoked from network); 10 May 2004 04:36:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO indexgeo.net) (65.77.211.93) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 10 May 2004 04:36:50 -0000 Received: from [192.168.1.100] (dsl-109.227.240.220.dsl.comindico.com.au [220.240.227.109]) (authenticated bits=0) by www2.kc.aoindustries.com (8.12.9-20030917/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i4A4CbKc019216 for ; Sun, 9 May 2004 23:12:39 -0500 Subject: RE: [QVote] Release 2.1.5 on May 14th From: David Crossley To: dev@cocoon.apache.org In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Organization: Message-Id: <1084162355.28156.1633.camel@ighp> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 (1.2.2-5) Date: 10 May 2004 14:12:36 +1000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > > Sylvain Wallez a �crit : > > > ...There are still many little things to solidify in the CForms API > > > until it can be marked stable, and therefore Cocoon 2.1.5 will not > > > contain a stable CForms.... > > > > +1, let's not forget to release early, release often. > > CForms can still mature after 2.1.5. > > Exactly. > > We shouldn't get into the trap of "we have to finish XYZ before we > can release" again. The FirstFriday was a little bit active and some Bugzilla issues were addressed. The Roadmap shows that there are some major problems still: http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/showdependencytree.cgi?id=25321 Do we really want to release in this state? --David