Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 40276 invoked from network); 10 May 2004 04:46:09 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 10 May 2004 04:46:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 15748 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2004 04:41:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 15700 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2004 04:41:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 15686 invoked from network); 10 May 2004 04:41:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO indexgeo.net) (65.77.211.93) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 10 May 2004 04:41:57 -0000 Received: from [192.168.1.100] (dsl-109.227.240.220.dsl.comindico.com.au [220.240.227.109]) (authenticated bits=0) by www2.kc.aoindustries.com (8.12.9-20030917/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i4A3x9Kc013552 for ; Sun, 9 May 2004 22:59:11 -0500 Subject: Re: Supersonic block has landed (Power Trio tutorial/example app) From: David Crossley To: dev@cocoon.apache.org In-Reply-To: <40980558.3060605@upaya.co.uk> References: <7B8FE75C-9DF1-11D8-9AE6-000A95AF004E@apache.org> <40980558.3060605@upaya.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1084161547.2082.1623.camel@ighp> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 (1.2.2-5) Date: 10 May 2004 13:59:08 +1000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Upayavira wrote: > ...My immediate > response is 'why the name supersonic'. It obfuscates the contents of the > block. Why not just have a tutorial block, or a tutorials block if there > are more than one in there? That way it is completely obvious to someone > looking at Cocoon what is in there, and they'll be off coding, without > any additional help from us. But with this name, it just becomes one > amongst many unclear names: fop, deli, cron, batik, axis, slide, slop, > stx, velocity, etc, etc, etc. I think that it should be called the "tour" block, yet still have the familiar name of "Supersonic Tour". IIRC we decided that we should use functional names for the actual blocks. That is why we changed the "woody" name and why the new kernel did not get a fanciful name. --David