cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Greg Weinger <>
Subject Re: [Plan] The future of Cocoon
Date Fri, 28 May 2004 05:07:01 GMT
Tim Larson wrote:

>>>We *can* make this officially but this requires a vote. For example, the 
>>>new tree processor orginally written for 2.2 (using Fortress) did imho not 
>>>support this.
>>Don't know if it does support it now, but adding it would be IMO fairly 
>>Now I'm all of course for making this official, furthermore considering 
>>that blocks will need more than just sitemap components.
>>Ready to start a vote?
>Early +1 because I like the idea of not having to restart Cocoon for
>every cocoon.xconf change.  IIUC, if we can move some things into the top
>sitemap, we can be more modular, and change configs without restarting.
This indeed would be wonderful.  I happened to have it on my plate to 
figure out how to add or change datasource configurations at runtime.

--Greg Weinger

View raw message