cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sylvain Wallez <>
Subject Re: [Plan] The future of Cocoon
Date Thu, 27 May 2004 14:33:53 GMT
Antonio Gallardo wrote:

>Sylvain Wallez dijo:
>>Personal note: your post made many people rush into my office saying
>>"What, what, deprecate XSP? He's crazy!" ;-)
>lol. Just yesterday we had a little discussion about that in the office.
>We wonder why nobody commented about XSP deprecation! :-D
>We have 2 application running XSP.
>I think what Carsten thought is to let the XSP block live alone. No
>dependencies to it at all. Currently, there are many blocks requiring XSP
>just for samples and that is not good.

Hehe. Isn't it a good indicator that XSP is still well alive, even if 
not the latest fashion?

>Also you end up including the block even when the overall application don't use XSP at
all. As a sample there is auth-fw and the session-fw.

Uh? Where does the need to include it come from? From samples?


Sylvain Wallez                                  Anyware Technologies 
{ XML, Java, Cocoon, OpenSource }*{ Training, Consulting, Projects }

View raw message