cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sylvain Wallez <>
Subject Re: Cocoon after 2.1.5
Date Mon, 10 May 2004 08:04:00 GMT
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:

>Considering all our version discussions, we want the next Cocoon
>version to be a minor version change, so this will be 2.2.
>We will put new features into it that were planned for 2.2 anyway,
>perhaps except blocks.
>Pier suggested that we follow the Linux versioning, so the version
>numbers .0, .2, etc. mark stable versions whereas .1,.3 etc. mark
>developer versions.
>If we want to follow this, we should imho skip 2.2, use 2.3 to
>indicate a developer version and 2.4 will then be the final and
>stable version.

I'm sorry, but I never understood this concept of "developper version". 
Can it be called a version if it's for developpers only ? Isn't this 
actually a development _branch_ that can be given whatever name we want, 
such as "newkernel" as was suggested ?


Sylvain Wallez                                  Anyware Technologies 
{ XML, Java, Cocoon, OpenSource }*{ Training, Consulting, Projects }

View raw message