Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 77673 invoked from network); 19 Apr 2004 08:06:13 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Apr 2004 08:06:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 36390 invoked by uid 500); 19 Apr 2004 08:05:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 36204 invoked by uid 500); 19 Apr 2004 08:05:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 36174 invoked from network); 19 Apr 2004 08:05:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.s-und-n.de) (212.8.217.2) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Apr 2004 08:05:42 -0000 Received: from notes.sundn.de (ntsrv5.sundn.de [10.10.2.10]) by mail.s-und-n.de (postfix) with ESMTP id D062B19F5C4 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 10:05:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hw0386 ([10.10.2.54]) by notes.sundn.de (Lotus Domino Release 6.5) with ESMTP id 2004041909585193-68302 ; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 09:58:51 +0200 From: "Carsten Ziegeler" To: Subject: RE: Continue Development of 2.1.x Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 10:08:24 +0200 Organization: S&N AG MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 thread-index: AcQkpV6v1k92OIoaSBWAAnMXZ9eiUwBP9Eww X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on PBSN1/Systeme und Netzwerke(Release 6.5|September 26, 2003) at 19.04.2004 09:58:51, Serialize by Router on PBSN1/Systeme und Netzwerke(Release 6.5|September 26, 2003) at 19.04.2004 09:58:52, Serialize complete at 19.04.2004 09:58:52 Message-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Ok, I have counted +1 from Stefano, Antonio, Reinhard, Ralph and Gianugo (and myself of course :) ) And we have the concerns from Ugo and Joerg? What do you two think, now after I could convince Ralph :) ? Carsten > -----Original Message----- > From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:cziegeler@s-und-n.de] > Sent: Saturday, April 17, 2004 8:06 PM > To: Cocoon-Dev > Subject: Continue Development of 2.1.x > > The development of blocks for 2.2 has started, but as others > have already pointed out, it might take time to get it > implemented and running well. > > So, I would suggest that we change our development plan a > little bit and consider adding those features to our 2.1.x > code base that are independent from blocks, like e.g. the > virtual sitemap components etc. Of course we should take care > that the changes are not incompatible (apart from the one below :) ). > > WDYT? > > In addition I would like to "port back" the changes I made to > the environment handling in 2.2 to 2.1.x as they improve the > performance and clean up some hacks (not all :( ) we have in > the code. And this would also make Leo's wish regarding the > CocoonComponentManager easier. Unfortunately these changes > are not 100% compatible: the o.a.c.Processor and the > o.a.c.e.Environment interfaces have to change for this. But > this shouldn't effect users, so it should be ok to change it. > Is this ok? > > As a last note, my rewritten tree processor is growing (it's > not feature complete yet), but I think it is very soon able > to process all features of the sitemap and adding such things > like virtual components shouldn't be that hard (hopefully). > > Carsten > > Carsten Ziegeler > Open Source Group, S&N AG > http://www.osoco.net/weblogs/rael/ > >