Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 28784 invoked from network); 14 Apr 2004 12:46:52 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Apr 2004 12:46:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 42872 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2004 12:46:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 42807 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2004 12:46:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 42766 invoked from network); 14 Apr 2004 12:46:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mailfe08.swip.net) (212.247.154.225) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Apr 2004 12:46:40 -0000 Received: from [80.170.7.105] (HELO apache.org) by mailfe08.swip.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2b2) with ESMTP id 10922610 for dev@cocoon.apache.org; Wed, 14 Apr 2004 14:46:38 +0200 Message-ID: <407D32A9.1060309@apache.org> Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 14:46:33 +0200 From: Sylvain Wallez Organization: Anyware Technologies User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113 X-Accept-Language: fr, en, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: fi:styling type="date References: <20040406153203.8772.qmail@minotaur.apache.org> <4074A193.9010901@gmx.de> <1081411934.11910.245.camel@123.13 yum.ot yum <4076AF2F.1010007@gmx.de> <1081580942.10090.76.camel@123.13 yum.ot yum <4077BD22.2090108@gmx.de> <1081605059.10092.336.camel@123.13 yum.ot yum <407D27EC.8@outerthought.org> In-Reply-To: <407D27EC.8@outerthought.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Marc Portier wrote: > > > Bruno Dumon wrote: > >> On Sat, 2004-04-10 at 11:23, Joerg Heinicke wrote: >> >>> On 10.04.2004 09:09, Bruno Dumon wrote: >>> >>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> ok. I'll try to look into it (should be pretty trivial to add). >>> >>> >>> That would be cool. Just a comment, what maybe is obvious: The above >>> syntax is different to the one in the definition, we should use the >>> same one: . >> >> >> >> yep, that's right. I did it like that. Now in CVS. The old fi:styling >> type="date" is not supported anymore, I guess that's fine? >> > > > Well, it's not completely ok: > > When checking up on the sample form1 you'll see that the > 'alternative-birth-date' doesn't get styled any more as the > selection-list it used to be, but now with the date-picker popup! > > I mentioned this to Bruno live this morning: he mentioned (without > giving it much thought) that xslt priority of matchers might be the > way to solve this (considering other suggestions couldn't hurt) > > any takers? > as bruno didn't sound like diving into it here and now (too busy on > other stuff) Or more simply: a field should not issue datatype information if it has a selection-list, since the user then has no other choice than choosing in that list. Sylvain -- Sylvain Wallez Anyware Technologies http://www.apache.org/~sylvain http://www.anyware-tech.com { XML, Java, Cocoon, OpenSource }*{ Training, Consulting, Projects }