Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 12868 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2004 12:15:44 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Apr 2004 12:15:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 47972 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2004 12:15:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 47888 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2004 12:15:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 47816 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2004 12:15:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mout.perfora.net) (217.160.230.41) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Apr 2004 12:15:34 -0000 Received: from [217.160.230.50] (helo=smtp.perfora.net) by mout.perfora.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1BBYRT-0003qi-00 for dev@cocoon.apache.org; Thu, 08 Apr 2004 08:15:35 -0400 Received: from [208.185.179.12] (helo=reverycodes.com) by smtp.perfora.net with asmtp (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1BBYRT-0007Ig-00 for dev@cocoon.apache.org; Thu, 08 Apr 2004 08:15:35 -0400 Message-ID: <40753DC0.2060503@reverycodes.com> Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2004 07:55:44 -0400 From: Vadim Gritsenko User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7b) Gecko/20040316 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: disabling widgets References: <407142EA.9000906@apache.org> <20040405153742.GV20141@keow.org> In-Reply-To: <20040405153742.GV20141@keow.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Tim Larson wrote: >We need to be able to specify the hidden state and the >selection of {both|output|input|neither} both statically in > > +1 >the widget definitions and dynamically via flowscript, Java, >binding, and event handling, but not via the view, of course. > > I don't see a necessity to provide so much flexibility. Vadim