Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 67049 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2004 23:00:16 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Apr 2004 23:00:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 45417 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2004 22:59:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 45137 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2004 22:59:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 45118 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2004 22:59:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.gmx.net) (213.165.64.20) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Apr 2004 22:59:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 1499 invoked by uid 65534); 6 Apr 2004 23:00:03 -0000 Received: from a183069.studnetz.uni-leipzig.de (EHLO gmx.de) (139.18.183.69) by mail.gmx.net (mp016) with SMTP; 07 Apr 2004 01:00:03 +0200 X-Authenticated: #3483660 Message-ID: <40733670.9080502@gmx.de> Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2004 01:00:00 +0200 From: Joerg Heinicke User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113 X-Accept-Language: de-de, de, en-us, en-gb, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: [RT] - XUL revisited.... References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hello Corin, I would be really interested what means "XUL in production" for your company. We have created a remote web application with XUL almost a year ago: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=106448994624522&w=4. The mentioned URL is no longer online as the company is dead. The application and me are now at another company. I know the application is still in live use, but I don't know really the current status. Joerg On 05.04.2004 23:42, Corin Moss wrote: > Hiya, > > +++++++1 > > I can't quite say how many plus ones the idea of XUL support from Cforms > gets from me. As I mentioned earlier, we've been using XUL in > production to drive a web based GUI for a couple of months now. The > feature set we get is just amazing. The other interesting thing, in > relation to Luke's point is that there is actually a flash based XUL > engine - meaning that those 98% could still make use of the XUL. It's > not fully featured yet, and does carry a non OSS license with it - but > bear it in mind: > > http://zulu.netspedition.com/zulu/main/overview.shtml > > The other thing to consider here is *shudder* Longhorn. M'soft have > made it very clear that their next gen GUI interface will be based > around a beast incredibly similar to XUL. If we start with XUL support > now, adapting a Longhorn interface also becomes fairly trivial. > > I'm willing to help in any XUL development exercise. > > Corin