Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 9866 invoked from network); 2 Apr 2004 01:32:46 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Apr 2004 01:32:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 55422 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2004 01:32:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 55363 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2004 01:32:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 55349 invoked from network); 2 Apr 2004 01:32:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO avocet.mail.pas.earthlink.net) (207.217.120.50) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Apr 2004 01:32:25 -0000 Received: from 1cust156.tnt3.barrie.on.da.uu.net ([66.48.153.156] helo=andrzej) by avocet.mail.pas.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1B9DXs-0007It-00; Thu, 01 Apr 2004 17:32:33 -0800 From: "Andrzej Jan Taramina" Organization: Chaeron Corporation To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2004 20:35:55 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Known concurrency issues in 2.1.4/JISP bugs....possible workaround? Reply-to: andrzej@chaeron.com CC: agallardo@agssa.net, bdelacretaz@codeconsult.ch, unico@hippo.nl Message-ID: <406C7D2B.24481.1AEE6B31@localhost> Priority: normal In-reply-to: <34515.10.0.0.5.1080666002.squirrel@ags01.agsoftware.dnsalias.com> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v4.12a) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-description: Mail message body X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Antonio suggested (and Bertrand/Unico also elaborated on this): > > We're getting some sporadic strange errors that might be due to > > concurrency > > issues between different users, and I was wondering if there are any known > > bugs outstanding in 2.1.4 for this kind of thing? > > The problem can be the cache system: Just a thought....if I have the following specified in my cocoon.xconf settings: Note: @xxx@ values are substituted using an Ant deploy script, so ignore that stuff. With both having use-persistent-cache set to false, does that mean that JISP (the default persistent caching mechanism in 2.1.4) will never be called, and thus the concurrency errors should never manifest? Or do I need to also do something to my persistent store config settings, which currently look like: An aside...what the heck is the "order" value anyway? Much appreciate any insight on this, since we don't need persistent caching for our production application, and this might be a "quick fix" for a very vexing and difficult to reproduce problem. Thanks all! Andrzej Jan Taramina Chaeron Corporation: Enterprise System Solutions http://www.chaeron.com