Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 41151 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2004 12:20:30 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Apr 2004 12:20:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 92226 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2004 12:20:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 92199 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2004 12:20:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 92186 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2004 12:20:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp01.myhosting.com) (168.144.68.181) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Apr 2004 12:20:24 -0000 Received: from lagrange ([81.225.125.114]) by smtp01.myhosting.com (Merak 7.1.0) with ASMTP id DXA74513 for ; Thu, 01 Apr 2004 07:20:23 -0500 From: "Leo Sutic" To: Subject: RE: [Kernel2.2] Comments Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 14:20:22 +0200 Message-ID: <031f01c417e3$b4f69350$0801a8c0@lagrange> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 In-Reply-To: <4A68086D-83D6-11D8-8057-000393C27E0C@betaversion.org> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Importance: Normal X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > From: Pier Fumagalli [mailto:pier@betaversion.org] > > On 1 Apr 2004, at 12:27, Leo Sutic wrote: > > > Can we add an attribute or something to each block saying > > "yes, I can be gracefully redeployed" or "when you undeploy me, > > you must cut all wires immediately"? > > I think you could achieve the same result by listening to the destroy() > event triggered by the framework when the block is undeployed. OK, so this even is guaranteed to be sent before the new block is deployed? /LS