Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 55752 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2004 11:55:34 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Apr 2004 11:55:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 54699 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2004 11:55:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 54389 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2004 11:55:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 54369 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2004 11:55:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp02.myhosting.com) (168.144.68.182) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Apr 2004 11:55:28 -0000 Received: from lagrange ([81.225.125.114]) by smtp02.myhosting.com (Merak 7.1.0) with ASMTP id DXA74513 for ; Fri, 16 Apr 2004 07:55:27 -0400 From: "Leo Sutic" To: Subject: RE: CocoonComponentManager Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 13:55:26 +0200 Message-ID: <006e01c423a9$b5c29550$0801a8c0@lagrange> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 In-reply-to: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Importance: Normal X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:cziegeler@s-und-n.de] > > Now, I personally think, if we change this, we should first > use the improved code from the 2.2 base as it has less static > methods and is in some respects cleaner and then see what we > can do with the remaining stuff. But that's just my opinion. The 2.2 branch will probably be very different from the existing code, with blocks etc., so perhaps this will be a non-issue by then. /LS