From dev-return-58705-apmail-cocoon-dev-archive=cocoon.apache.org@cocoon.apache.org Thu Apr 01 19:17:12 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 95088 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2004 19:17:12 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Apr 2004 19:17:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 16419 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2004 19:16:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 16331 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2004 19:16:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 16217 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2004 19:16:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mout.perfora.net) (217.160.230.41) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Apr 2004 19:16:44 -0000 Received: from [217.160.230.52] (helo=smtp.perfora.net) by mout.perfora.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1B97gH-0001GX-00 for dev@cocoon.apache.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2004 14:16:49 -0500 Received: from [208.185.179.12] (helo=reverycodes.com) by smtp.perfora.net with asmtp (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1B97gH-0006Ja-00 for dev@cocoon.apache.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2004 14:16:49 -0500 Message-ID: <406C6A98.2080203@reverycodes.com> Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2004 14:16:40 -0500 From: Vadim Gritsenko User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7a) Gecko/20040219 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Block Samples, Re: excluding unstable blocks by default References: <200404011300.i31D03O26562@otsrv1.iic.ugent.be> <406C52DC.6080209@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <406C52DC.6080209@gmx.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Joerg Heinicke wrote: > On 01.04.2004 15:00, stevenn@outerthought.org wrote: > >> + ! Exclude unstable blocks from the default build >> + + Edit the blocks.properties file and exclude all unstable blocks. >> + Since it's a release they should not get compiled by default. > > > What about a vote on this? I'm -0.1 on excluding unstable blocks by > default. And Vadim is working on th refactoring of the blocks samples > page in dependency on the stable/unstable status. This should give the > most prominent hint to users about block's status. Refactoring is done, please check how it worked out. Now page is constructed from gump.xml and *.xsamples files, taking /xsamples/group/sample tags from those. Content of the /xsamples/group tags is ignored, patching is not done anymore, and blocks samples moved into /samples/blocks/ directory, so they are now not mixed together with core samples. PS I'm -0.95 on excluding unstable blocks, and +0.74 for excluding deprecated blocks. Vadim